PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
SCHWARTZ, Judge (specially concurring).
I concur in affirmance but would do so only specifically without prejudice to a subsequent determination of the issue raised herein concerning the proper interpretation of the proposed ordinance if (a) the proposal is approved by the voters and (b) such a determination is otherwise necessary and appropriate. See Wilson v. Dade County,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.