Writ denied.
TATE, J., dissents. Although the thoughtful majority is persuasive, I agree with the dissent in the court of appeal that appellate review should not disturb the trier of facts' overall factual appreciation that the motorist was negligent in travelling blindly at 15-20 MPH (instead of, say, at 5 MPH, a speed permitting an immediate stop) in an area where such conduct could be expected to create undue hazard to small neighborhood children, reasonably expected...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
