Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered.
No issue has been presented with respect to the facts. The testimony at trial revealed that the sole identification of appellant at the time of the sale was made by the undercover officer. Testimony was adduced from the officer in charge of the back-up team to the effect that the undercover officer had pointed appellant out to him on other occasions, in the neighborhood, as the seller. Such testimony constituted...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
