MARICONDA v. PETRUSER

No. 78-1336.

369 So.2d 105 (1979)

Lillian Lee MARICONDA, Appellant, v. Erwin A. PETRUSER, a/K/a Erwin Petrusek, and Betty Petruser, a/K/a Betty Petrusek, and Continental Insurance Company, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 3, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hodges, Gossett, Weiss, McDonald & Wakefield and Perry W. Hodges, Jr., Hollywood, for appellant.

Corlett, Merritt, Killian & Sikes and Gerald E. Rosser, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HUBBART, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Two points are presented on this appeal, one being procedural and the other going to the substantive basis for the final judgment entered. The procedural point does not present reversible error under the principles stated in Marsh v. Sarasota County, 97 So.2d 312 (Fla. 2d DCA 1957). Having passed the procedural question, an examination of the record reveals that the judgment is adequately supported by the evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases