CHATTANOOGA BOILER & TANK CO. v. RITTENBERRY

No. KK-211.

379 So.2d 961 (1979)

CHATTANOOGA BOILER AND TANK COMPANY, Appellant, v. William RITTENBERRY and Monsanto Corp. and Monsanto Textiles Company, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 9, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert D. Bell, of Fisher, Bell, Hahn, Winn & Rubel, Pensacola, for appellant.

J. Nixon Daniel, III, of Beggs & Lane, Pensacola, for appellees.


PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment notwithstanding verdict entered in favor of Monsanto, the employer of Rittenberry, following the entry of a verdict in favor of the third party tortfeasor, Chattanooga, on its claim for indemnity against Monsanto. Chattanooga had alleged Monsanto was actively negligent in causing certain injuries suffered by its employee, Rittenberry, during the course of employment, while Chattanooga was only passively negligent. There can be no...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases