CHAN v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERV.

No. 78-2375.

610 F.2d 651 (1979)

Vincent Sik-Hung CHAN and Pauline Poon-Kar Chan, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

December 28, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gordon G. Dale, Santa Ana, Cal., for petitioners.

Lauri S. Filppu, Washington, D.C., on brief; Margaret J. Perry, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before GOODWIN and TANG, Circuit Judges, and LYDICK, District Judge.


TANG, Circuit Judge.

Vincent and Pauline Chan are husband and wife, natives of Hong Kong, and citizens of Great Britain. The Chans remained past the time authorized by their student visas, and after a hearing, were ordered deported. The Chans then applied for suspension of deportation, but this was denied.

The immigration judge concluded, and the Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed, that the Chans were ineligible for suspension of deportation because they...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases