CRUCIBLE INC. v. UNITED STATES

No. 336-77.

591 F.2d 643 (1979)

CRUCIBLE INC. v. The UNITED STATES.

United States Court of Claims.

January 24, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter L. Briger, New York City, for plaintiff. Aydin S. Caginalp and Briger & Associates, New York City, of counsel.

Robert S. Watkins, Washington, D.C., with whom was Asst. Atty. Gen. M. Carr Ferguson, Washington, D.C., for defendant. Theodore D. Peyser, Jr., and Jay G. Philpott, Jr., Washington, D.C., of counsel.

Before FRIEDMAN, Chief Judge, and KUNZIG and BENNETT, Judges.


ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM:

The principal issue in this case, here on cross-motions for summary judgment, is whether in its federal income tax returns the plaintiff properly deducted in the year of accrual amounts accrued under its 1962 Supplemental Unemployment Benefits ("SUB") Plan. For the reasons explained below, we grant in part and deny in part each motion for summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases