The place of the alleged employment was a family-owned drug store and the claimant admittedly worked on and off and did not reveal this information to the unemployment office. As the result of a conversation with a claim examiner on July 8, 1979, she was advised that the work she was doing might not comply with the unemployment insurance rules and she thereafter stated she did no work at the drug store, although there is evidence that she was seen on August 8 behind the counter...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
