Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
We believe that the Parole Board had sufficient evidence before it to justify its denial of parole to the petitioner. However, it should be noted that the petitioner's allegation contained in his petition that the Parole Board did not have a report of an up-to-date psychiatric examination of him at the time of the parole eligibility hearing, was not controverted by the Parole Board in its answer. We therefore direct...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
