Judgment reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, and a new trial granted as between plaintiff and the respondents, with costs to abide the event.
While as to respondents Cacoulidis and DJR Equities Corp. plaintiff was required to show that there was a high degree of probability that the lease would have been completed but for the alleged interference (see Union Car Adv. Co. v Collier, 263 N.Y. 386; Smith v Emlan Realty Corp.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.