Contrary to the comment in the dissent, we do not suggest that I. C. Parts are exempt from the Rules of the Supreme Court. We hold only that the particular responsibilities of a Judge to whom a case is assigned for trial is entitled to consideration in evaluating his exercise of discretion. It is surely pertinent that the trial court could reasonably have concluded that defendant had been led to believe that the plaintiff would interpose no objection to a physical examination...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
