We do not consider that the action of the Board of Standards and Appeals in granting this minor variance on account of hardship was arbitrary, capricious or illegal, and accordingly we are not justified in interfering with the board's action. The variance involved an encroachment of about eight inches onto the required front yard of appellants' property as well apparently as a roofed over stoop area. It does not appear to us that this was a case in which appellants acted...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
