KRAVITZ v. PRESSMAN, FROHLICH & FROST, INC.

Civ. A. No. 74-5222-T.

447 F.Supp. 203 (1978)

Judy KRAVITZ v. PRESSMAN, FROHLICH & FROST, INC., et al.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

February 15, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Choate, Hall & Stewart, Weld S. Henshaw, Owen S. Walker, Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

George R. Desmond, Framingham, Mass., for Ronald Contrado.

Robert Sullivan, Herrick, Smith, Donald, Farley & Ketchum, Gerald F. Rath, Boston, Mass., for Bache & Co., Inc.

William M. Prifti, Herbert S. Cohen, Boston, Mass., for Pressman, Frohlich & Frost.


MEMORANDUM

TAURO, District Judge.

Plaintiff relies on the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities and Exchange Act of 19341 to recover money invested with the defendant brokerage firm (Pressman), as well as commissions paid by her to that firm. Plaintiff's theory is that she was defrauded by Ronald Contrado while he was employed as a stockbroker by Pressman.2

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases