1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 65 A.D.2d
  5. 65 A.D.2d 519 (1978)
 

ROBBINS v. ELLMAN

65 A.D.2d 519 (1978)

I. D. Robbins et al., Respondents, v. Edward Ellman et al., Individually and Doing Business as Eddy Provision Co., Appellants, et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

October 12, 1978

The conclusory affidavits submitted by plaintiffs' attorney at this early stage in the proceedings fail to establish that the "director" and "tenant" groups have divided, adverse and conflicting interests in defending this action. Therefore, the law firm of Colman & Liner should not have been disqualified from representing those defendant groups. (Lewis v Palestine, 50 A.D.2d 752.) Should the facts, as later developed in this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases