ORDER OF SUSPENSION PENDING FINAL DETERMINATION
Comes now the Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court and files "Motion for Suspension Pending Prosecution," which Motion appears more fully in words and figures as follows, to-wit:
And comes now the appointed Hearing Officer and, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23, § 14(g), submits his written recommendation for suspension pending the determination of this cause.
This Court, being duly advised in the premises, now finds that, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23, § 14(g), the Hearing Officer conducted a hearing on the Motion for temporary suspension and found that the Respondent failed in his burden of establishing why he should not be suspended from the practice of law pending the determination. Accordingly, this Court now further finds that the recommendation of the Hearing Officer should be accepted and approved.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED by this Court that the Respondent, Biagio J. Perrello, is hereby suspended from the practice of law in this State pending final determination by this Court of the present cause.
All Justices concur.