No. 678 S 105.

380 N.E.2d 72 (1978)

In the matter of Biagio J. PERRELLO.

Supreme Court of Indiana.

September 13, 1978.


Comes now the Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court and files "Motion for Suspension Pending Prosecution," which Motion appears more fully in words and figures as follows, to-wit:


And comes now the appointed Hearing Officer and, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23, § 14(g), submits his written recommendation for suspension pending the determination of this cause.

This Court, being duly advised in the premises, now finds that, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23, § 14(g), the Hearing Officer conducted a hearing on the Motion for temporary suspension and found that the Respondent failed in his burden of establishing why he should not be suspended from the practice of law pending the determination. Accordingly, this Court now further finds that the recommendation of the Hearing Officer should be accepted and approved.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED by this Court that the Respondent, Biagio J. Perrello, is hereby suspended from the practice of law in this State pending final determination by this Court of the present cause.

All Justices concur.


1000 Characters Remaining reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases