1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 84 Wis.2d
  5. 84 Wis.2d 236 (1978)
 

STATE v. HUNGERFORD

No. 76-529-CR.

84 Wis.2d 236 (1978)

267 N.W.2d 258

STATE, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HUNGERFORD, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 30, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs and oral argument by Howard B. Eisenberg, state public defender.

For the respondent the cause was argued by Pamela Magee-Heilprin, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general.

HANLEY, J.

Three issues are raised on this appeal:

1. Are statements made by a person in the course of treatment pursuant to his commitment under the Sex Crimes Act privileged and not admissible at a proceeding to determine the necessity of continued confinement under the Act?

2. Is evidence of a person's criminal record admissible at a hearing to determine the necessity of extending that person's confinement under the Sex Crimes Act?

3. Did...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases