1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 83 Wis.2d
  5. 83 Wis.2d 185 (1978)
 

STEWART v. STATE

No. 76-031-CR.

83 Wis.2d 185 (1978)

265 N.W.2d 489

STEWART, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided May 2, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error the cause was argued by Ruth S. Downs, deputy state public defender, with whom on the briefs were Howard B. Eisenberg, state public defender, and Alvin E. Whitaker, assistant state public defender.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Marguerite M. Moeller, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general.

HANLEY, J.

The sole issue presented for review is whether there was sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict of guilty.

There is no serious dispute that the evidence adduced at this trial, circumstantial or otherwise, demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt that a burglary and attempted theft had taken place at the Liberty Pharmacy in the early hours of January 2, 1975. What the defendant does dispute in this appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases