The issue posed by this case is whether or not defendant was improperly denied its constitutional right to a jury trial. (Cal. Const., art. I, § 16.) We will conclude that because plaintiff's suit for damages for breach of contract was based entirely upon the equitable doctrine of promissory estoppel (see Drennan v. Star Paving Co. (1958)
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
C & K ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS v. AMBER STEEL CO.
Docket No. S.F. 23837.
23 Cal.3d 1 (1978)
587 P.2d 1136
151 Cal. Rptr. 323
C & K ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. AMBER STEEL COMPANY, INC., Defendant and Appellant.
Supreme Court of California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 22, 1978.
December 22, 1978.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Di Giorgio, Davis & Klein and V.P. Di Giorgio for Defendant and Appellant.
Gill & Baldwin, Samuel D. Hale, Jr., and Leroy M. Gire for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Supreme Court of California.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
