CLEVELAND ELEC. ILLUMINATING CO. v. E. P. A.

Nos. 76-2090, 77-1367; 76-2225, 77-1366; 76-2240, 77-1355; 76-2242, 77-1359; 76-2244, 77-1363; 76-2276, 77-1368.

572 F.2d 1150 (1978)

The CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY, the Dayton Power & Light Co., the Ohio Edison Co., the Toledo Edison Co., the Timken Co., White-Westinghouse Corp., the Standard Oil Co. of Ohio, Interlake, Inc., the Coulton Chemical Corp., Petitioners, and The State of Ohio, Intervenor, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, Respondents.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided February 13, 1978.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied April 18, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis E. Tosi, C. Randolph Light, Fuller, Henry, Hodge & Snyder, Toledo, Ohio, Daniel W. Kemp, Cincinnati Gas & Elec., Cincinnati, Ohio, for Cincinnati Gas and Elec. Co., Interlake, Inc. and Coulton Chemical Corp.

Van Carson, Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Cleveland, Ohio, for White-Westinghouse Corp. and Standard Oil Co.

Robert M. Rybolt, Day, Ketterer, Raley, Wright & Rybolt, Canton, Ohio, C. Randolph Light, Louis E. Tosi, Fuller, Henry, Hodge & Snyder, Toledo, Ohio, for Timken Co.

Paul M. Kaplow, Land and Natural Resources Div., Pollution Control Section, Dept. of Justice, Ronald C. Hausmann, E. P. A., Washington, D. C., Mary Ann Muirhead, E. P. A., Chicago, Ill., James W. Moorman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Angus Macbeth, Chief, Pollution Control Section, Dept. of Justice, Joan Z. Bernstein, Gen. Counsel, E. P. A., Washington, D. C., for respondents.

John W. Edwards, Lane, Alton & Horst, Columbus, Ohio, for amicus curiae, Ohio Mining and Reclamation Ass'n.

William W. Wehr, Freifield, Bruzzese, Wehr, Morland & England, LPA, Stuebenville, Ohio, for amicus curiae, Ohio Coal Operators' Ass'n, Inc.

William J. Brown, Atty. Gen. of Ohio, Environmental Law Section, David E. Northrop, Columbus, Ohio, for Intervenor, State of Ohio.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and EDWARDS and PECK, Circuit Judges.


Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied in Nos. 76-2090, 77-1367; 76-2225, 77-1366; 76-2240, 77-1355 April 18, 1978.

EDWARDS, Circuit Judge.

This court now has before it 23 petitions involving 32 companies filed against the United States Environmental Protection Agency which levy a variety of complaints against the federal agency's imposition of a sulfur dioxide (SO2) pollution control plan for industrial discharges into Ohio's ambient...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases