HOARD v. TELETYPE CORP.

Civ. No. LR-74-C-381.

450 F.Supp. 1059 (1978)

Nathaniel HOARD, Plaintiff, v. TELETYPE CORPORATION, Defendant, Richard Davis, Plaintiff-Intervenor.

United States District Court, E. D. Arkansas, W. D.

May 8, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

P. A. Hollingsworth, Hollingsworth, Bilheimer & Crutcher, Little Rock, Ark., for plaintiff and plaintiff-intervenor.

Richard Mays, Walker, Kaplan & Mays, Little Rock, Ark., for intervenors Burlon Joiner and Alma Gipson.

Robert S. Lindsey, Wright, Lindsey & Jennings, Little Rock, Ark., for defendant.


HEANEY, District Judge, by designation.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. The plaintiff Nathaniel Hoard is black. He was employed by the defendant Teletype Corporation from November 8, 1965 until his discharge on October 16, 1972. He is an appropriate class representative for a Rule 23(b)(2) class consisting of all black employees who allege that they were discharged on account of race by Teletype from December 3, 1971 to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases