The board found: "based on the credible evidence, claimant was required to use his own automobile in order to perform his job; therefore his trip to work became part of his employment. It is, therefore, found that accident arising out of and in the course of employment is established." Issues of fact are for the board and its decision is supported by substantial evidence and it is not erroneous as a matter of law (see Matter of Lutgen v Conte Elec.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF MANG v. ACTUS AUTO. DISTRIBS., INC.
62 A.D.2d 1103 (1978)
In the Matter of the Claim of Ruth Mang, Respondent, v. Actus Automobile Distributors, Inc., et al., Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 20, 1978
April 20, 1978
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
