Only one week after serving the summons and complaint and without issue having been joined, plaintiff served a notice of discovery and inspection. Many of the items of the demand are improper and in the context of this record, such demand can be characterized as prolix and burdensome. The remedy under these circumstances is not pruning of the demand by Special Term by eliminating some items, but rather vacatur of the entire demand (see Carroad v Regensburg,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
CHRYSLER CORP. v. FEDDERS CORP.
62 A.D.2d 943 (1978)
Chrysler Corporation, Respondent, v. Fedders Corporation, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 13, 1978
April 13, 1978
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
