1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 429 U.S.
  5. 429 U.S. 477 (1977)
 

BRUNSWICK CORP. v. PUEBLO BOWL-O-MAT, INC.

No. 75-904.

429 U.S. 477 (1977)

BRUNSWICK CORP. v. PUEBLO BOWL-O-MAT, INC., ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided January 25, 1977.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard G. Segal argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Ira P. Tiger, Joseph A. Tate, Miles G. Seeley, and Thomas B. McNeill.

Malcolm A. Hoffmann argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Edward A. Woolley.*

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case raises important questions concerning the inter-relationship of the antimerger and private damages action provisions of the Clayton Antitrust Act.

I

Petitioner is one of the two largest manufacturers of bowling equipment in the United States. Respondents are three of the 10 bowling centers owned by Treadway Companies, Inc. Since 1965, petitioner...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases