Order reversed, on the law, and indictment reinstated.
No findings of fact were presented for review. The evidence presented to the Grand Jury was legally sufficient to sustain the indictment charging defendant-respondent with reckless endangerment in the first degree (see CPL 190.65, subd 1; 210.20, subd 1, par [b]; Penal Law, § 120.25). Under the circumstances of this case, it was not
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
