Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.
In our opinion, under the facts of this case, a jury could determine that the loss of the eye was caused by an accident within the meaning of the policy. The depositing of the infected animal matter on the plaintiff-appellant's eye while he was working was totally unforeseen and unexpected, and a jury could properly find that that was the sole contributing cause of the infection which...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
