1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 279 Md.
  5. 279 Md. 385 (1977)
 

NICK-GEORGE LTD. v. AMES-ENNIS, INC.

[No. 122, September Term, 1976.]

279 Md. 385 (1977)

368 A.2d 1001

NICK-GEORGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. AMES-ENNIS, INC.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided February 8, 1977.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur R. Hessel, with whom were Judith A. Armold and J. Wilmer Cronin on the brief, for appellant.

David A. Carney and Richard D. Neidig, with whom were Reese, Kane & Carney on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES, LEVINE, ELDRIDGE and ORTH, JJ., and ROBERT F. SWEENEY, Chief Judge of the District Court of Maryland, specially assigned.

SINGLEY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case raises the question of the limitations imposed upon judicial review of an arbitrator's award under the Maryland Uniform Arbitration Act (the Act), now Maryland Code (1974), Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article § 3-223 and § 3-224. The sections respectively set out conditions upon which an arbitrator's award may be corrected or modified and the grounds upon which it may be vacated. Because the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases