Order affirmed, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements payable jointly to respondents by defendant-appellant.
When the plaintiff's premises were damaged by fire on March 19, 1975, the only insurance policy that provided coverage against such loss was the policy issued by the appellant. The policy issued by defendant Aetna, although technically in effect, did not provide coverage for the premises by reason of its 60-day vacancy suspension clause. In pertinent...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.