Writ denied. On the facts found by the court of appeal, there is no error of law.
TATE, J., dissents from denial. For the reasons stated by the dissenting opinions in the court of appeal he feels that the court of appeal majority exceeded the proper scope of appellate review by re-evaluating testimony reasonably found credible by the trial court.
DIXON and CALOGERO, JJ., are of the opinion the writ should...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
