KIRKLAND v. OHIO CAS. INS.

No. 3996-1.

18 Wn. App. 538 (1977)

569 P.2d 1218

ELEANOR V. KIRKLAND, ET AL, Respondents, v. OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

October 3, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clarke, Clarke, Albertson & Bovingdon and Fred G. Clarke, Jr., for appellant.

Foulds, Felker & Gelfand, P.S., and Tom H. Foulds, for respondents.


CALLOW, J.

This case involves a dispute between two insurance companies as to whether liability for a fire loss should be paid entirely by the joint plaintiff, Reliance Insurance Company, as sole insurer of Conduff, the purchaser in possession who had the legal burden of loss, or whether it should be apportioned between Reliance and the defendant, Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, because the policy of each company insured the interest of the seller to Conduff.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases