1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 425 F.Supp.
  5. 425 F.Supp. 22 (1977)
 

SID BERK, INC. v. UNIROYAL, INC.

No. 76-1674-(AAH).

425 F.Supp. 22 (1977)

SID BERK, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNIROYAL, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, C. D. California.

January 3, 1977.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Loeb & Loeb by Robert A. Holtzman (Fulton Brylawsky, J. Michael Cleary, Washington, D.C. and Gerald A. Weinstein, Encino, Cal., on the briefs), having appeared for plaintiff and Harvey E. Bumgardner, Jr., New York City.

Rutan & Tucker by Bruce R. Corbett, Santa Ana, Cal. (Garvin F. Shallenberger, Santa Ana, Cal., and Arthur, Dry & Kalish, New York City, on the briefs), having appeared for defendant.

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION — DENYING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

HAUK, District Judge.

Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction is denied in its entirety.

Pursuant to Rule 52(a), F.R.Civ.Proc. and Rule 7(a) of the Rules of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, this Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.

FINDINGS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases