STITELER v. BELL TELEPHONE CO. ET AL.

No. 1801 C.D. 1976.

32 Pa.Commw. 319 (1977)

Chester W. Stiteler, Petitioner v. The Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania and The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Respondents.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

November 4, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark B. Aronson, with him Behrend and Aronson, for petitioner.

Donald F. Clarke, with him Sheldon Seligsohn and W. Preston Granbery, for respondent, The Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania.

Barnett Satinsky, Chief Counsel, with him Shirley Rae Don, Assistant Counsel, and Paul E. Russell, Assistant Counsel, for respondent, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.

Submitted on briefs, September 16, 1977, to President Judge BOWMAN and Judges MENCER and BLATT, sitting as a panel of three.


OPINION BY PRESIDENT JUDGE BOWMAN, November 4, 1977:

Before us is a petition for review in the nature of an appeal from an order of the Public Utility Commission (PUC) dismissing Chester W. Stiteler's (Stiteler) complaint against The Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania (Bell). The PUC order was entered on September 20, 1976.

The history of a dispute between Stiteler and Bell leading to the PUC order reveals the following. Stiteler alleges that on July 23...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases