SMITH, Judge.
A conviction for auto theft. Although the trial court charged the jury that each material allegation of the information must be proved, and that those allegations included the defendant's "intent to permanently deprive or defraud the true owner of the property of the use and benefit thereof," the court did not repeat "permanently" when defining larceny. There was no objection. There was no fundamental error. Humphries v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
