Per Curiam.
Respondent was admitted to the Bar in the First Judicial Department on November 4, 1935. He is charged with receiving interest at a usurious rate from a client, for a loan which was secured by a note and mortgage in which respondent named his wife as lender and mortgagee. Upon repayment of that loan respondent, without authorization from his wife, signed her name to a satisfaction of mortgage and notarized that signature. The record supports the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.