1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 554 F.2d
  5. 554 F.2d 926 (1977)
 

TIGER INTERN., INC. v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BD.

No. 75-1774.

554 F.2d 926 (1977)

TIGER INTERNATIONAL, INC. and the Flying Tiger Line, Inc., Petitioners, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 18, 1977.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

M. Laurence Popofsky, Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, San Francisco, Cal., Charles N. Brower, John Lewis, White & Case, Washington, D. C., argued, for petitioners.

Griffin B. Bell, U. S. Atty. Gen., U. S. Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div., Jerome Nelson, Gen. Counsel, Civil Aeronautics Bd., Thomas E. Kauper and Carl D. Lawson, Antitrust Div., App. Section, U. S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., argued for respondent.

Before GOODWIN and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and FERGUSON, District Judge.

WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

This appeal comes to us in the form of a petition to review certain orders of the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB). 49 U.S.C. § 1486. The petitioners, Tiger International, Inc. (TI)1 and The Flying Tiger Line Inc. (FTL), argue that the CAB had no jurisdiction to issue Order 70-6-119 and that it acted beyond its authority, in an arbitrary and capricious manner, without a basis in substantial evidence, and in violation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases