PER CURIAM.
The appellant was charged with robbery, grand larceny, and resisting arrest. He was tried before a jury, acquitted of Count I, convicted of a lesser-included offense under Count II, and convicted under Count III.
On appeal, error is asserted in the form of the verdict as rendered in the conviction for the lesser-included offense under Count II, and that the trial judge should have declared a mistrial because of the alleged improper comment by counsel...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
