Writ denied. Under the facts found, we cannot say the result is incorrect.
SANDERS, C.J., is of the opinion that a writ should be granted, being of the opinion that the dissenting views expressed by Presiding Judge Samuel in the Court of Appeal are legally correct. See La.App.,
SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion that the writ should be granted, agreeing with the dissenting opinion of Judge Samuel. See
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.