HENZEL v. GOLSTEIN

No. 76-1165.

349 So.2d 824 (1977)

Leo HENZEL, Appellant, v. Edwin GOLSTEIN and S.W.F.P. Company, a Florida Corporation, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

September 13, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E.C. Watkins, Jr., Tampa, for appellant.

Hugh F. Quinn, South Miami, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, C.J., and PEARSON and HUBBART, JJ.


HUBBART, Judge.

By this appeal we are asked to review a trial court order dismissing an action for lack of prosecution. The appellant contends that he was given inadequate notice for the hearing on the appellee's motion to dismiss the action for lack of prosecution. We agree and reverse.

Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.420(e)1 contemplates that a party should have sufficient notice for a hearing on an adverse motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases