STARBUCK v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

No. 75-2213.

556 F.2d 450 (1977)

Charles STARBUCK et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 28, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard M. Kaplan (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Terry J. Houlihan (argued), San Francisco, Cal., Phyllis L. Hubbell (argued), Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendants-appellees.

McMorris M. Dow, Deputy City Atty. (argued), for defendant-appellee City and County of San Francisco.

Before HUFSTEDLER and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and EAST, District Judge.


HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:

The present appeal gives renewed vitality to the long-time dispute over the delivery of hydroelectric power from the Hetch Hetchy Valley to the Bay Area. Appellants, residents, taxpayers, and consumers of electricity in San Francisco, allege that San Francisco's present "wheeling" arrangement with the Pacific Gas and Electric Company violates Section 6 of the Raker Act of December 19, 1913, ch. 4, 38 Stat. 242, establishing the Hetch Hetchy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases