1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 67 Mich.
  5. 67 Mich. App. 736 (1976)
 

SCHOLTEN v. RHOADES

Docket No. 25039.

67 Mich. App. 736 (1976)

242 N.W.2d 509

SCHOLTEN v. RHOADES

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided March 9, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daudert, Barron & Tucker, for plaintiff.

Lilly, Piatt, Doyle & Kragt, for defendant Walter Miskowski.

Before: QUINN, P.J., and J.H. GILLIS and ALLEN, JJ.

ALLEN, J.

Does the "name and retain" provision of the 1972 amendment to the dramshop act1 mandate that in an action brought by a father for the medical expenses of his minor son, allegedly incurred by reason of being served intoxicants, the son must be joined as a party defendant? This issue of first impression arises by leave granted on the following facts.

Plaintiff Donald R. Scholten was struck and injured on September 9, 1972...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases