1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 330 So.2d
  5. 330 So.2d 392 (1976)
 

FUSELIER v. McGEE

No. 5516.

330 So.2d 392 (1976)

Conrad FUSELIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Roger Dale McGEE et al., Defendant-Appellee.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

On Application for Rehearing April 20, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tate & Tate, by Donald J. Tate, Mamou, for defendant-appellant.

John C. Fontenot, Ville Platte, for plaintiff-appellee.

I. Stephen George, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellee.

Before HOOD, CULPEPPER, DOMENGEAUX, WATSON and GUIDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an election contest instituted under the provisions of LSA-R.S. 18:420. That statute provides that when an appeal is taken in such a case the appellate court will decide the issue within 24 hours after submission. LSA-R.S. 18:420E.

After considering the facts, the law and the arguments of counsel, we have concluded that there is no error in the judgment rendered by the trial court.

In view of the provisions of LSA-R.S. 18:420E,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases