HUNTLEY v. REED


556 P.2d 122 (1976)

276 Or. 591

Hugh HUNTLEY, Appellant, v. James S. REED, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided November 12, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter D. Nunley, Medford, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Grant, Ferguson & Carter, Medford.

William V. Deatherage, of Frohnmayer & Deatherage, Medford, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was James L. Sutherland, Medford.

Before DENECKE, C.J., and O'CONNELL, HOLMAN, TONGUE, HOWELL, BRYSON and LENT, JJ.


HOLMAN, Justice.

This is an action for damages alleged to have resulted from defendant's medical malpractice. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant based upon a jury verdict.

Defendant operated upon plaintiff for the removal of a cataract. There followed intermittent hemorrhaging, with bleeding into the anterior chamber of the eye, which subsequently necessitated the removal of the eyeball.

The first assignment of error we consider involves...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases