1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 71 N.J.
  5. 71 N.J. 587 (1976)
 

REMSDEN v. DEPENDABLE INSURANCE CO.

71 N.J. 587 (1976)

367 A.2d 421

RICARDO REMSDEN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DEPENDABLE INSURANCE CO., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 23, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Leonard J. Altamura argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Altamura and Finnerty, attorneys).

Mr. Bryan Cohen argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Ballen and Cohen, attorneys; Mr. Arthur E. Ballen on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by SCHREIBER, J.

The plaintiff Ricardo Remsden instituted an action in the Hudson County District Court to recover from his collision insurance carrier, the defendant Dependable Insurance Company, Inc., compensation for damages resulting from an accident involving his vehicle. The District Court concluded that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover because of a false representation made in the plaintiff's application for the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases