1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 69 N.J.
  5. 69 N.J. 574 (1976)
 

STATE v. J.O.

69 N.J. 574 (1976)

355 A.2d 195

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. J.O. AND F.C., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 25, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Peter S. Hamerslag, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mr. Hamerslag, of counsel and on the brief).

Mr. Emerson L. Darnell argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Messrs Darnell and Scott, attorneys; Mr. Darnell on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

Defendants were convicted of committing an act of private lewdness in violation of N.J.S.A. 2A:115-1, which provides:

Any person who commits open lewdness or a notorious act of public indecency, grossly scandalous and tending to debauch the morals and manners of the people, or in private commits an act of lewdness or carnal indecency with another, grossly scandalous and tending to debauch the morals and manners of the people, is guilty of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases