1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 229 S.E.2d
  5. 229 S.E.2d 321 (1976)
 

LANIER v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY COM'N

No. 762IC384.

229 S.E.2d 321 (1976)

31 N.C. App. 304

Harry LANIER, Administrator of the Estate of Theodocia Lanier, v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

November 3, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen., Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Ralf F. Haskell, Raleigh, for the State.

Milton E. Moore, Moore & Moore, Williamston, for claimant-appellant.

MORRIS, Judge.

In his sole assignment of error, claimant contends that the Commission erred in its failure to find, as a matter of law, that the pit in question was an attractive nuisance. In reviewing an order of the Industrial Commission, we are guided by the principle that the order will stand if its findings of fact are supported by competent evidence and if its conclusions of law are supported by the findings of fact. Tanner v. Dept. of Correction,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases