1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 399 Mich.
  5. 399 Mich. 103 (1976)
 

SALAS v. CLEMENTS

Docket No. 56624, (Calendar No. 1).

399 Mich. 103 (1976)

247 N.W.2d 889

SALAS v. CLEMENTS

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided December 27, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lopatin, Miller, Bindes & Freedman (Michael H. Feiler, of counsel) for plaintiffs.

Leonard A. Baun for defendant.

WILLIAMS, J.

The issue in this case is whether plaintiffs, who claim they do not know the identity of an alleged intoxicated person who injured them, are barred from maintaining a cause of action under the Michigan dramshop act, because they did not "name and retain" the alleged intoxicated person as defendant as required by the "name and retain" amendment to the act.

We hold that the "name and retain" amendment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases