In the Matter of Arthur E. Blyn et al., Respondents,
v.
Richard J. Bartlett, as State Administrative Judge, et al., Appellants
In the Matter of Joseph P. Acer et al., Respondents,
v.
Mayor of the City of New York et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 1.)
In the Matter of Alfred M. Ascione et al., Respondents,
v.
City of New York et al., Appellants
In the Matter of Confidential Attendants Association of the Supreme Court et al., Respondents,
v.
Richard J. Bartlett, as State Administrative Judge, et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 15, 1976
January 15, 1976
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Michael R. Juviler (Michael Colodner, Joseph Milano and Arthur Weinstein of counsel), for Richard J. Bartlett and others, appellants.
W. Bernard Richland, Corporation Counsel (Leonard Koerner, L. Kevin Sheridan and Rosemary Carroll of counsel), for the Mayor of the City of New York and others, appellants.
Szold, Schapiro & Coster (John I. Coster of counsel), for Arthur E. Blyn and others, respondents.
Julien & Schlesinger, P.C. (Alfred S. Julien, Stuart A. Schlesinger and David Jaroslawicz of counsel), for Joseph P. Acer and others, respondents.
Shea, Gould, Climenko, Kramer & Casey (Francis Bergan, Saul S. Streit and Richard L. Spinogatti of counsel), for Alfred M. Ascione and others, respondents.
Stroock, Stroock & Lavan for Confidential Attendants Association of the Supreme Court and others, respondents.
Robert H. Silk for New York State Trial Lawyers Association, amicus curiae.
Howard B. Sherman and Michael W. Brody for New York County Lawyers Association, amicus curiae.
Alvin Mitchel for Bronx County Bar Association, amicus curiae.
Hershman & Leicher, P.C. (Harold M. Hershman of counsel), for Queens County Bar Association, amicus curiae.
SWEENEY, J. P., KANE, MAIN and REYNOLDS, JJ., concur.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.
LARKIN, J.
These appeals, each involving separate proceedings consolidated at Special Term, arise from the same facts and involve similar issues.
Because the petitioners in these various proceedings are the persons most substantially affected by the allegedly improper acts of the appellants and, therefore, the persons most likely to invoke the judicial process to seek redress therefor, we reject all claims...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
