PER CURIAM.
The only contention of appellant on this appeal is that the court committed fundamental error in admitting in evidence a waiver of rights form signed by appellant. The waiver was objected to at the time by appellant on the ground that it had not been produced in response to appellant's demand for discovery and also on the ground that it was not relevant. The waiver was not introduced in support of any statement or confession of appellant, as no evidence...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
