We consider whether the trial court abused its discretion in ruling that a group of homeowners in a planned development subdivision may maintain a class action against the developer for fraudulently misrepresenting the cost and extent of maintenance of the project. Applying the principles enunciated in Vasquez v. Superior Court (1971) As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.
Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.GET STARTED
OR
Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to
continue
OCCIDENTAL LAND, INC. v. SUPERIOR COURT
Docket No. L.A. 30556.
18 Cal.3d 355 (1976)
556 P.2d 750
134 Cal. Rptr. 388
OCCIDENTAL LAND, INC., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY, Respondent; FRED FAHNESTOCK, Real Party in Interest.
Supreme Court of California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 29, 1976.
November 29, 1976.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
O'Melveny & Myers, Allyn O. Kreps, Robert J. White and Matthew T. Kirby for Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondent.
Wenke, Burge & Taylor, John R. Schilling and Daniel Nishiyama for Real Party in Interest.
Supreme Court of California.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
