1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 71 N.J.
  5. 71 N.J. 298 (1976)
 

PANZINO v. CONTINENTAL CAN COMPANY

71 N.J. 298 (1976)

364 A.2d 1043

LOUIS PANZINO, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. CONTINENTAL CAN COMPANY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided September 29, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Jerry M. Finn argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Goldberger, Siegel and Finn, attorneys).

Mr. John W. Taylor argued the cause for respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by MOUNTAIN, J.

Petitioner filed a claim for occupational hearing loss six years after retiring from his employment with respondent corporation. As the Workmen's Compensation Act was then written, this time span exceeded the permissible period within which such a claim was required to be filed. Two months before his claim was heard, however, a statutory amendment abrogated the time limitation. The issue before us is whether the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases