1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 531 F.2d
  5. 531 F.2d 1357 (1976)
 

TUROFF v. MAY CO.

No. 75-1697.

531 F.2d 1357 (1976)

Mr. & Mrs. Jack N. TUROFF, and Mr. & Mrs. Robert S. Turoff, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The MAY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided March 16, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert S. Turoff, Turoff & Turoff, Jeffrey Glazer, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiffs-appellants.

William B. Norris, Hahn, Loeser, Freedheim, Dean & Wellman, David G. Heiman, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant-appellee.

Before CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judge, McCREE, Circuit Judge, and MARKEY, Chief Judge, U. S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

PER CURIAM.

The Turoffs appeal from the final judgment in favor of The May Company (May), granted upon motion for summary judgment.

Issues

Was the district court correct in concluding that: (1) the Turoffs did not have standing to represent the class of May charge account customers similarly situated; (2) use of the "previous balance"** billing method does not violate the Ohio Usury Law, O.R.C. 1343.01, the Uniform Commercial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases